Does the Direct Argument Beg the Question?

American Philosophical Quarterly 59 (1):81-96 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The direct argument is among the most prominent arguments for the incompatibility of determinism and moral responsibility. Some critics of the argument have accused it, or certain defenses of its central premise, of begging the question. This article responds to that accusation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Responsibility for necessities.Stephen Kearns - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (2):307-324.
Shabo on logical versions of the Direct Argument.P. Roger Turner - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (8):2125-2132.
A Contextualist Reply to the Direct Argument.Matthew H. Slater - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (1):115-137.
A Counterexample to A.Charles Hermes - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (2):387-389.
Defending Direct Source Incompatibilism.Eric Yang - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (3):325-333.
What must a proof of incompatibilism prove?Seth Shabo - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (3):361-371.
Jackson's apostasy.William S. Robinson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 111 (3):277-293.
Kearns on Rule A.P. Roger Turner - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (1):205-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-25

Downloads
34 (#458,553)

6 months
13 (#182,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Justin A. Capes
Flagler College

References found in this work

Causation and Free Will.Carolina Sartorio - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
An essay on free will.Peter van Inwagen & A. Phillips Griffiths - 1985 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 175 (4):557-558.
Farewell to the Direct Argument.David Widerker - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy 99 (6):316.

View all 22 references / Add more references