In this paper, I will analyze Charles S. Peirce’s “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God.” I want to argue for two conclusions: 1) that Peirce’s conception of spontaneous conjectures of instinctive reason allows for a rationally justified belief in the reality of God; and 2) that this belief is not the result of a sound argument or even a complete argument and thus is not a secure belief. This paper is divided into three parts. First, I will explain some Peircean philosophical notions that are essential background information for a genuine understanding of the neglected argument. Second, I will present a sketch of Peirce’s three stages of inquiry and explain each stage’s relevance to the neglected argument. Finally, I will analyze Peirce’s first stage of inquiry, also known as the humble argument for the reality of God, and show how this incomplete argument can provide a rationally justified belief in the reality of God
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Conference Proceedings  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0065-7638
DOI 10.5840/acpaproc20027615
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Normative Sciences at Work and Play.Charles G. Conway - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 288-311.
Peirce's Pragmatic Theology and Stoic Religious Ethics1.John R. Shook - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):344-363.
Hume's Pragmaticist Argument for the Reality of God.Hermann Deuser & Dennis Beach - 1995 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 9 (1):1 - 13.
Il Lume Naturale: Abduction and God.Jaime Nubiola - 2004 - Semiotiche 1 (2):91-102.
Resurrecting Peirce's "Neglected Argument" for God.Dennis Kohatyn - 1982 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 18 (1):66 - 74.
Is God's Belief Requirement Rational?Greg Janzen - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (4):465-478.
Peirce's Neglected Argument.Bowman L. Clarke - 1977 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 13 (4):277 - 287.
The Ontological Argument Reconsidered.Oded Balaban & Asnat Avshalom - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:279-310.
Three Appeals in Peirce's Neglected Argument.Douglas R. Anderson - 1990 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26 (3):349 - 362.
Peirce, Hegel, and the Category of Secondness.Robert Stern - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (2):123 – 155.


Added to PP index

Total views
18 ( #607,806 of 2,504,869 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,869 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes