Ratio Juris 20 (1):32-44 (2007)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In this paper we consider whether a pragmatics of semantic content can be a useful approach to legal interpretation. More broadly speaking, since a pragmatic conception of meaning is a component of inferential semantics, we consider whether an inferentialist approach to legal interpretation can be useful in dealing with some problems of this important aspect of law. In other words, we ask whether Legal Inferentialism is a suitable conception for legal interpretation. In Section 1 we briefly consider the semantics/pragmatics debate in contemporary philosophy of language and in relation to legal interpretation. In Section 2 we discuss the relations between a pragmatics of semantic content and an inferentialist conception of content. In Section 3 we consider how Inferentialism can be applied to legal interpretation. Finally, in Section 4 we consider some possible advantages and drawbacks of Inferentialism applied to legal interpretation and adjudication.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00345.x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment.Robert Brandom - 1994 - Harvard University Press.
Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic.Rudolf Carnap - 1947 - Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
View all 38 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The a Simili Argument: An Inferentialist Setting.Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (4):499-509.
What the Legislature Did Not Say.Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (3):249-270.
Linguistic Objectivity in Norm Sentences: Alternatives in Literal Meaning.David Duarte - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (2):112-139.
Economic Consequences for Lawyers.Fabrizio Esposito & Giovanni Tuzet - 2020 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 9 (3):368-398.
The A Simili Argument: An Inferentialist Setting.Giovanni Tuzet Damiano Canale - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (4):499-509.
Similar books and articles
Semantic and Legal Interpretation : Two Approaches to Legal Translation.Marta Chromá - 2008 - In V. K. Bhatia, Christopher Candlin & Paola Evangelisti Allori (eds.), Language, Culture and the Law: The Formulation of Legal Concepts Across Systems and Cultures. P. Lang.
14. Toward a Theory of Legal Interpretation.Scott Soames - 2014 - In Analytic Philosophy in America: And Other Historical and Contemporary Essays. Princeton University Press. pp. 299-319.
Can Theories of Meaning and Reference Solve the Problem of Legal Determinacy?Brian H. Bix - 2003 - Ratio Juris 16 (3):281-295.
A Methodology to Create Legal Ontologies in a Logic Programming Based Web Information Retrieval System.José Saias & Paulo Quaresma - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):397-417.
Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Role of Semantic Content.Jeffrey C. King & Jason Stanley - 2005 - In Zoltan Gendler Szabo (ed.), Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. pp. 111--164.
Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy.Andrei Marmor (ed.) - 1995 - Oxford University Press.
Why the Debate Between Originalists and Evolutionists Rests on a Semantic Mistake.John M. Collins - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (6):645-684.
Categorías Teóricas En El Lenguaje Jurídico Y Su Formalización.Roberto José Vernengo - 1987 - Theoria 3 (1):191-202.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-09-02
Total views
54 ( #211,980 of 2,518,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,791 )
2010-09-02
Total views
54 ( #211,980 of 2,518,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads