Nomothesia in classical athens: What sources should we believe?

Classical Quarterly 63 (1):139-160 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the fifth centuryb.c.e.the Athenians did not make any distinction between laws and decrees. The Assembly passed both kinds of measures in the same way, and both general enactments and short-term provisions held the same legal status. At the end of the fifth century, however, the Athenians decided to make a distinction between the two kinds of measures and created the rule that no decree would be superior to a law. The Assembly continued to pass decrees in the same way, but a new body ofnomothetaiwas created to ratify laws. There were also two separate procedures for rescinding the two kinds of measures: one could bring agraphê paranomôn against apsêphismaand agraphê ‘nomon mê epitêdeion theinai’ against anomos. This much is clear; scholars do not agree however about the procedure for passing a new law in fourth-century Athens.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nomothesia in fourth-century Athens.P. J. Rhodes - 1985 - Classical Quarterly 35 (01):55-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
30 (#521,181)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?