Do We Need a Normative Account of the Decision to Parent?

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):277-290 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper provides an analysis of several philosophically interesting results of a recent study of the fertility decision-making of thirty-five childless/childfree Australian and American women. While most of the women in the study endorsed and expanded on longstanding normative prescriptions for how a “good” mother ought to feel and behave, they were at a loss (at times quite literally) to explain why a woman should decide to mother in the first place. For several women, this difficulty led them to conclude that a decision to have a child was “irrational.” After seeking to explain how women understood this term and why some drew this conclusion, I will argue that applied philosophers should respond to the findings by creating normative accounts of the decision to parent. Suggestions are made about what such accounts should include, and avoid, to ensure relevance to women and acceptability to both feminist and non-feminist philosophers.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,549

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Clinical Research Involving Pregnant Women ed. by Françoise Baylis and Angela Ballantyne. [REVIEW]Elizabeth Victor - 2019 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 12 (1):175-179.


Added to PP

47 (#334,768)

6 months
10 (#397,263)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Begetting: What Does It Mean to Create a Child?Mara van der Lugt - 2024 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references