Developing CSR Giving as a Dynamic Capability for Salient Stakeholder Management

Journal of Business Ethics 130 (2):403-421 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we draw upon the emerging view of strategic cognition and issue salience and show that CSR giving has evolved into more than an altruistic response to being asked for support, to one which is embedded in the strategic frames of management and which supports organizational identity. The managerial action as a result of such strategic cognition suggests that modern organizations are seeking to develop CSR giving processes that provide them with a competitive advantage. We draw on the resource-based view of organizations and the VRIO framework to provide the theoretical foundations for our argument that CSR implementation in the form of corporate giving to charities can be developed as a dynamic capability. This can provide a competitive advantage by allowing organizations to manage key stakeholder relationships more effectively with benefits which could lead to increased organizational productivity and the ability to execute strategy more effectively. We interview CSR implementation managers from large organizations in Australia and find that the CSR giving process in many firms is evolving into a more sophisticated and strategically motivated process with expectations of a return. Central to this evolution is the appointment of a CSR implementation manager who acts as a boundary spanner between the organization and its key stakeholders. We posit that this corporate investment in their role and supporting structures can lead to the better management of stakeholders by organizations through the dynamic capability of the CSR giving process. We develop a table of best practise to help guide managers entering this sphere.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stakeholder Management Theory, Firm Strategy, and Ambidexterity.Mario Minoja - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):67-82.
Symposium.Michael E. Johnson-Cramer & Shawn Berman - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:298-301.
A Dynamic Perspective in Freeman’s Stakeholder Model.Yves Fassin - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):39-49.
Stakeholder Identities, Trust and Cooperation: A Social Identity Perspective.Thomas Schneider - 2013 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 24:214-225.
Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy.Adele Santana - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
The Role of Dynamics in Stakeholder Thinking.Duane Windsor - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):79-87.
God as a Managerial Stakeholder?Mark S. Schwartz - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2/3):291 - 306.
“Stakeholder Work” and Stakeholder Research.Jae Hwan Lee & Ronald K. Mitchell - 2013 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 24:208-213.
The Importance of Competency, Reputation, and Goodwill in Re-Establishing Stakeholder Relationships.Karen Paul & Inge Nickerson - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:291-295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
28 (#553,203)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Business & society: ethics and stakeholder management.Archie B. Carroll - 2002 - Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Pub./Thomson Learning. Edited by Ann K. Buchholtz.
Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility.Michael L. Barnett - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:287-292.
Philanthropy as strategy.A. Buchholtz, A. Carroll & D. Saiia - 2003 - Business and Society 42 (2):169-201.

View all 26 references / Add more references