- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why We Shouldn't Reason Classically, and the Implications for Artificial Intelligence
In Vincent C. Müller (ed.), Computing and philosophy: Selected papers from IACAP 2014. Cham: Springer. pp. 151--165 (2016)
Abstract
In this paper I argue that human beings should reason, not in accordance with classical logic, but in accordance with a weaker ‘reticent logic’. I characterize reticent logic, and then show that arguments for the existence of fundamental Gödelian limitations on artificial intelligence are undermined by the idea that we should reason reticently, not classically.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Alan Bundy (ed.), Catalogue of Artificial Intelligence Techniques; Dennis Mercadal, Dictionary of Artificial Intelligence; Jenny Raggett and William Bains, Artificial Intelligence from A to Z; Ellen Thro, The Artificial Intelligence Dictionary.S. S. Ali - 1996 - Minds and Machines 6:100-105.
Artificial Intelligence and Wittgenstein.Gerard Casey - 1988 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 32:156-175.
Consciousness, intentionality, and intelligence: Some foundational issues for artificial intelligence.Murat Aydede & Guven Guzeldere - 2000 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):263-277.
The Human Mind According to Artificial Intelligence: Theory, Research, and Implications.Morton Wagman - 1999 - Praeger.
Joseph F. Rychlak, artificial intelligence and human reason: A teleological critique. [REVIEW]Marek Hetmański - 1999 - Minds and Machines 9 (3):421-424.
"Every man in his notions" or alchemists' discussion on artificial intelligence.Mariusz Flasiński - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):107-121.
Re-creating the Philosopher’s Mind: Artificial Life from Artificial Intelligence.Maurice H. T. Ling - 2012 - Human-Level Intelligence 2:1.
Artificial Intelligence and Human Reason: A Teleological Critique.Joseph F. Rychlak - 1991 - Columbia University Press.
Cognitive sciences: basic problems, new perspectives and implications for artificial intelligence.Maria Nowakowska - 1986 - Orlando: Academic Press.
A Wittgensteinian view of artificial intelligence.Otto Neumaier - 1987 - In Rainer P. Born (ed.), Artificial Intelligence. St Martin's Press. pp. 132--174.
Natural problems and artificial intelligence.Tracy B. Henley - 1990 - Behavior and Philosophy 18 (2):43-55.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-08-29
Downloads
83 (#198,941)
6 months
9 (#295,075)
2016-08-29
Downloads
83 (#198,941)
6 months
9 (#295,075)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo