Double effect reasoning and cooperation

Bioethics Research Notes 24 (1):1 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Campbell, Ray This paper is an abbreviated version of a paper given at the National Colloquium for Catholic Bioethicists, Melbourne, 2012. That paper in turn was an abbreviated version of part of my doctoral thesis, The Human Act and Moral Responsibility, John Paul II Institute for Marriage and Family, Melbourne, 2011. The larger works give more of the context for this discussion and more examples.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Honors, Awards, and the Catholic Moral Tradition.Karen Stohr - 2010 - Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 49 (2):277-292.
Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Intention and responsibility in double effect cases.David K. Chan - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):405-434.
Killing Innocents and the Doctrine of Double Effect.John Zeis - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:133-144.
Clarifying Two Central Issues in Double Effect Reasoning Debates.Andrew M. Lang - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:279-292.
Defending double effect.Ralph Wedgwood - 2011 - Ratio 24 (4):384-401.
Four versions of double effect.Donald B. Marquis - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-27

Downloads
39 (#397,578)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references