Abstract
The paper challenges Joseph Salerno’s recent revisionist account in “The Place of Human Action in the Development of Economic Thought” of the relationship between Friedrich von Wieser and F.A. Hayek and of their views on equilibrium theory. The paper argues, contra Salerno, that Wieser was not a proponent of general equilibrium theory, so could not have influenced Hayek in the manner Salerno suggests; that there was not a concerted effort by Schumpeter, Wieser, Mayer, and Hayek to advocate general equilibrium theory in the prewar and inter-war years among the Austrians; and finally, that Hayek’s early attraction to what he called “equilibrium analysis” had causes independent of those alleged by Salerno.Cet article récuse l’interprétation révisionniste récente de Joseph Salerno dans son article “The Place of Human Action in the Development of Economic Thought” à propos des relations entre Friedrich von Wieser et Friedrich Hayek, et de leurs visions au sujet de l’équilibre. S’inscrivant en cela en opposition avec ce qu’avance Salerno, cet article suggère que Wieser n’était pas un partisan de la théorie de l’équilibre général et, en conséquence, ne peut avoir influencé Hayek comme le suggère Salerno ; qu’il n’y a eu aucun effort concerté entre Schumpeter, Wieser, Mayer et Hayek pour promouvoir la théorie de l’équilibre général parmi les autrichiens durant les années d’avant-guerre et celles de l’entre-deux guerres ; et enfin, que l’intérêt du jeune Hayek dans ce qu’il appelait “l’analyse de l’équilibre” avait des causes autres que celles évoquées par Salerno.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.2202/1145-6396.1047
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wieser, Hayek and Equilibrium Theory.Bruce Caldwell - 2011 - Nuova Civiltà Delle Macchine 29 (1/2):255-270.
Hayek, Equilibrium, and The Role of Institutions in Economic Order.Karen I. Vaughn - 2013 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 25 (3-4):473-496.
Hayek's Social and Political Thought.Roland Kley - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
Hayek: Cognitive Scientist Avant La Lettre.Leslie Marsh - 2010 - In William Butos, Roger Koppl & Steve Horwitz (eds.), Advances in Austrian Economics. Emerald.
The History of Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution.E. Angner - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (4):695-718.
Don't Shoot the Messenger: Caldwell's Hayek and the Insularity of the Austrian Project.Greg Hill - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):69-88.
On Hayek’s Confutation of Market Socialism.Robert Nadeau - 2011 - Nuova Civiltà Delle Macchine 29 (1/2):213-238.
Was Hayek an Instrumentalist?Ryszard Legutko - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (1):145-164.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-12

Total views
7 ( #1,063,221 of 2,497,804 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,497,804 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes