The Role of Clinical Psychology and Peer to Peer Support in the Management of Chronic Medical Conditions – A Practical Example With Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

&
Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00731

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project – a feasibility study of large‐scale clinical service peer review.Christopher M. Roberts, Rhona J. Buckingham, Robert A. Stone, Derek Lowe & Michael G. Pearson - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (5):927-932.
An educational programme for peer review groups to improve treatment of chronic heart failure and diabetes mellitus type 2 in general practice.Willeke N. Kasje, Petra Denig, Roy E. Stewart, Pieter A. de Graeff & Flora M. Haaijer-Ruskamp - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):613-621.
Self-management as management of self – contributions from psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy.Sattel Heribert & Henningsen Peter - 2017 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 24 (2):115-126.
A randomized trial of peer review: the UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project: three‐year evaluation.Christopher M. Roberts, Robert A. Stone, Rhona J. Buckingham, Nancy A. Pursey, Derek Lowe & Jonathan M. Potter - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):599-605.
What We Owe The Author: rethinking editorial peer review.N. J. Crigger - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (5):451-458.
What We Owe the Author: rethinking editorial peer review.N. J. Crigger - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (5):451-457.
Two-year-olds use adults’ but not peers’ points.Gregor Kachel, Richard Moore & Michael Tomasello - 2018 - Developmental Science:1-9.
Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (4):333-346.
Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: a five‐year study of assessment by peer review.John McKay, Paul Bowie & Murray Lough - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):622-629.
Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry.David Shatz - 2004 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Chronic care management for patients with COPD: a critical review of available evidence.Karin M. M. Lemmens, Lidwien C. Lemmens, José H. C. Boom, Hanneke W. Drewes, Jolanda A. C. Meeuwissen, Lotte M. G. Steuten, Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef & Caroline A. Baan - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):734-752.
'Peer review' culture.Dr Malcolm Atkinson - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):193-204.
Peer review and publication: Lessons for lawyers.Susan Haack - 2007 - Stetson Law Review 36 (3).
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Workplace learning through peer groups in medical school clerkships.C. L. Chou, A. Teherani, M. de MastersVener, M. Wamsley & A. Poncelet - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-26

Downloads
32 (#473,773)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references