Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018)
Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00731 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Common Psychological Factors in Chronic Diseases.Ciro Conversano - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Dispositional Optimism and Context Sensitivity: Psychological Contributors to Frailty Status Among Elderly Outpatients.Alberto Sardella, Vittorio Lenzo, George A. Bonanno, Gabriella Martino, Giorgio Basile & Maria C. Quattropani - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
Similar books and articles
The UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project – a Feasibility Study of Large‐Scale Clinical Service Peer Review.Christopher M. Roberts, Rhona J. Buckingham, Robert A. Stone, Derek Lowe & Michael G. Pearson - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (5):927-932.
An Educational Programme for Peer Review Groups to Improve Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 in General Practice.Willeke N. Kasje, Petra Denig, Roy E. Stewart, Pieter A. de Graeff & Flora M. Haaijer-Ruskamp - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):613-621.
Self-Management as Management of Self – Contributions From Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy.Sattel Heribert & Henningsen Peter - 2017 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 24 (2):115-126.
A Randomized Trial of Peer Review: The UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project: Three‐Year Evaluation.Christopher M. Roberts, Robert A. Stone, Rhona J. Buckingham, Nancy A. Pursey, Derek Lowe & Jonathan M. Potter - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):599-605.
What We Owe The Author: Rethinking Editorial Peer Review.N. J. Crigger - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (5):451-458.
What We Owe the Author: Rethinking Editorial Peer Review.N. J. Crigger - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (5):451-457.
Two-Year-Olds Use Adults’ but Not Peers’ Points.Gregor Kachel, Richard Moore & Michael Tomasello - 2018 - Developmental Science:1-9.
Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (4):333-346.
Variations in the Ability of General Medical Practitioners to Apply Two Methods of Clinical Audit: A Five‐Year Study of Assessment by Peer Review.John McKay, Paul Bowie & Murray Lough - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):622-629.
Chronic Care Management for Patients with COPD: A Critical Review of Available Evidence.Karin M. M. Lemmens, Lidwien C. Lemmens, José H. C. Boom, Hanneke W. Drewes, Jolanda A. C. Meeuwissen, Lotte M. G. Steuten, Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef & Caroline A. Baan - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):734-752.
The Principles and Practices of Peer Review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-07-26
Total views
20 ( #560,565 of 2,519,691 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,691 )
2018-07-26
Total views
20 ( #560,565 of 2,519,691 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,691 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads