Shared Responsibility, Global Structural Injustice, and Restitution

Social Theory and Practice 36 (2):263-290 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that even the most virtuous people living in affluent Western countries share responsibility for injustices suffered by poor people living in developing countries. The argument of the paper draws on a moral principle that underlies the law of restitution: the principle of unjust enrichment. The paper argues that denizens of affluent Western countries have benefited unjustly from injustices suffered by poor people living in developing countries and that they have a moral responsibility to pay back their unjust gains.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model.Iris Marion Young - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):102-130.
Responsibility for past injustice: How to shift the burden.Chandran Kukathas - 2003 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):165-190.
Global Justice: From Responsibility to Rights.Makoto Usami - 2013 - Discussion Paper, No. 2013–02, Department of Social Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology:1-12.
Punishing states that cause global poverty.Thom Brooks - 2007 - William Mitchell Law Review 33 (2):519-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
145 (#125,442)

6 months
17 (#142,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Todd Calder
Saint Mary's University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references