Nursing Ethics 19 (4):558-567 (2012)
AbstractThe Mental Capacity Act 2005 has stipulated that in England and Wales the ethical implications of carrying out research with people who are unable to consent must be considered alongside the ethical implications of excluding them from research altogether. This paper describes the methods that were used to enable people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities, who lacked capacity, to participate in a study that examined their experience of receiving intimate care. The safeguards that were put in place to protect the rights and well-being of participants are described, and it is argued that the approaches used in this study met the requirements set out in the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Although this paper is based on research involving people with intellectual disabilities, it has implications for research involving other groups who may also lack capacity to consent, including people with mental health problems, head injuries and dementia.
Similar books and articles
Ethical Research in Delirium: Arguments for Including Decisionally Incapacitated Subjects.Dimitrios Adamis, Adrian Treloar, Finbarr C. Martin & Alastair J. D. Macdonald - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):169-174.
Research Ethics Review: Social Care and Social Science Research and the Mental Capacity Act 2005.Jonathan Parker, Bridget Penhale & David Stanley - 2011 - Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (4):380-400.
Research Involving Adults Who Lack Capacity: How Have Research Ethics Committees Interpreted the Requirements?M. Dixon-Woods & E. L. Angell - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):377-381.
Children and the Argument From 'Marginal' Cases.Amy Mullin - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):291-305.
End-of-Life Care for Children and Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Christopher F. Barber - 2012 - Nursing Philosophy 13 (1):78-79.
Adults Are Not Big Children: Examining Surrogate Consent to Research Using Adults with Dementia.Mark Yarborough - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (2):160-168.
When Consent Doesn't Work: A Rights-Based Case for Limits to Consent's Capacity to Legitimise.Keith Hyams - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):110-138.
Children as Means and Ends in Large-Scale Medical Research.Garrath Williams - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (8):422-430.
Which Benefits of Research Participation Count as 'Direct'?Alexander Friedman, Emily Robbins & David Wendler - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (2):60-67.
The Intellectual Capacity of Women.David Stove - 1990 - Proceedings of the Russellian Society 15:1-16.
Negotiating Mutuality and Agency in Care-Giving Relationships with Women with Intellectual Disabilities.Pamela Cushing & Tanya Lewis - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (3):173-193.
Are Developmental Disabilities the Same in Children and Adults?Paula Tallal - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):768-769.
Confronting Condescending Ethics: How Community-Based Research Challenges Traditional Approaches to Consent, Confidentiality, and Capacity. [REVIEW]Colleen Reid & Elana Brief - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):75-85.
Genetic Research, Adolescents, and Informed Consent.Robert F. Weir & Jay R. Horton - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (4).
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Consent and Assent to Participate in Research From People with Dementia.Susan Slaughter, Dixie Cole, Eileen Jennings & Marlene A. Reimer - 2007 - Nursing Ethics 14 (1):27-40.