How Technology is Reframing the Abortion Debate

Hastings Center Report 16 (1):33-42 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, medical and scientific developments have focused greater public and professional attention on the status of the fetus. Their cumulative effect may influence legal, social, and moral thought and set the stage for a change in public opinion and a challenge to legalized abortion. There is as yet no inexorable convergence of medical data and legal opinion that would undermine the rationale of Roe v. Wade. But the prochoice movement must find room for an open airing of the moral questions if abortion is to remain what it should be— a legally acceptable act.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The place for individual conscience.Frances Kissling - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 2):24-27.
The moral significance of spontaneous abortion.T. F. Murphy - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):79-83.
Abortion, society, and the law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]: Press of Case Western Reserve University. Edited by J. Douglas Butler.
Stumbling on status: Abortion, stem cells, and faulty reasoning. [REVIEW]Karen Lebacqz - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):75-82.
The Relevance of Aristotle’s Notion of Equity for the Contemporary Abortion Debate.James M. Jacobs - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:119-132.
Is there a 'new ethics of abortion'?Raanan Gillon - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 2):5-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
16 (#855,572)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?