Do Deconstructive Ecology and Sociobiology Undermine Leopold’s Land Ethic?

Environmental Ethics 18 (4):353-372 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent deconstructive developments in ecology (doubts about the existence of unified communities and ecosystems, the diversity-stability hypothesis, and a natural homeostasis or “balance of nature”; and an emphasis on “chaos,” “perturbation,” and directionless change in living nature) and the advent of sociobiology (selfish genes) may seem to undermine the scientific foundations of environmental ethics, especially the Leopold land ethic. A reassessment of the Leopold land ethic in light of these developments (and vice versa) indicates that the land ethic is still a viable environmental ethic, if judiciously updated and revised.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Holists and Fascists and Paper Tigers...Oh My!Michael P. Nelson - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):103 - 117.
The Land Ethic, Moral Development, and Ecological Rationality.Charles Starkey - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):149-175.
Animal Liberation.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.
Is Hunting a Right Thing?Charles J. List - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (4):405-416.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
107 (#165,462)

6 months
10 (#276,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references