This workshop brought together people who are interested in or concerned about the course syllabus. Participants’ concerns and discussion centered on issues such as: 1) the purpose of the syllabus; 2) writing objectives for the course; and 3) evaluation of a syllabus
Keywords Business and Professional Ethics  Conference Proceedings  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 2155-2568
DOI 20051665
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Borrowed Syllabus.Lisa Newton - 1984 - Teaching Philosophy 7 (3):236-239.
The Borrowed Syllabus.Richard A. Wright - 1984 - Teaching Philosophy 7 (3):239-241.
The Case of “The Borrowed Syllabus”.Frans Van Der Bogert - 1986 - Teaching Philosophy 9 (3):261-264.
Note Sur le Syllabus 'Antirationaliste' du 7 Mars 1277.Roland Hisette - 2005 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 88 (3):404-416.
Early Essays and The Study of Ethics: A Syllabus.Herbert Wallace Schneider - 1972 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 10 (4):485-485.
The Standard Syllabus of Legal Philosophy.Leslie Green - 1988 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (1):107-111.
Syllabus in Philosophy of Education.William Heard Kilpatrick - 1934 - New York City, Teachers College, Columbia University.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #858,891 of 2,533,681 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,681 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes