Authors
Elisa Caldarola
University of Venice
Abstract
A caricature can reveal an aspect of its subject that a more faithful representation would fail to render: by depicting a slow and clumsy person as a monkey one can point out such qualities of the depicted subject, and by depicting a person with quite big ears as a person with enormous ears one can point out that the depicted person has rather big ears. How can a form of representation that is by definition inaccurate be so representationally powerful? Figurative language raises a similar puzzle. Metaphors, taken at face value, are usually false: men are not wolves. The same goes for hyperbolic talk: Putnam did not change his position one billion times in his career. Still, figurative language is expressively powerful: by saying that human beings are wolves or that Putnam changed his position one billion times in his career one conveys, in a very vivid way, some true information about the world (something concerning the facts that human beings are cruel and that Putnam frequently changed opinion). Kendall Walton (1993) provides an elegant explanation of the expressive utility of figurative language by linking metaphor and prop oriented make-believe. We explore the hypothesis that the theory of prop oriented make-believe can also explain the representational efficacy of caricatures.
Keywords Caricature  Prop Oriented Make-Believe  Kendall Walton  Metaphor  Depiction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.015
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The What and the How of Metaphorical Imagining, Part One.David Hills - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (1):13--31.
Caricatures, Myths, and White Lies.Kirsten Walsh & Adrian Currie - 2015 - Metaphilosophy 46 (3):414-435.
Gigantomachy and Natural Philosophy.D. C. Innes - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (01):165-.
When the Whistling Had to Stop.P. M. S. Hacker - 2001 - In David Charles & William Child (eds.), Wittgensteinian Themes: Essays in Honour of David Pears. Clarendon Press.
What’s Wrong With Aim-Oriented Empiricism?Nicholas Maxwell - 2015 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 3 (2):5-31.
Prop. III. X. 27.J. S. Phillimore - 1915 - The Classical Review 29 (03):95-.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-06

Total views
44 ( #259,337 of 2,519,819 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,671 of 2,519,819 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes