Alkimia Operativa and Alkimia Speculativa. Some Modern Controversies on the Historiography of Alchemy

Annual of Medieval Studies at CEU 16:166-190 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The accent on scientific and empirical character of alchemy, especially from the field of the history of science, promotes the idea that one can understand the cryptic and metaphorical language of alchemy mainly through the laboratory chemical practice. As a result, the tendency is to interpret the spiritual and esoteric language of alchemy, as metaphors for laboratory work and the most representative research on historiography of alchemy that point the spiritual character as being contaminated by esoteric sciences and Victorian occultism. This paper is paying attention to this dichotomy by attempting to understand the exclusivist position of the position that alchemy is a proto-chemistry and to see the consequences of such an interpretation. It is reviewed one of the most representative voices that interpret alchemy as spiritual by Carl. G. Jung and Mircea Eliade, and their rejection, as it is illustrated by William R. Newman and Lawrence M. Principe, showing the boundaries of both approaches and the hazarded character of understanding alchemy merely as part of the history of chemistry.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-02

Downloads
604 (#26,220)

6 months
83 (#45,409)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The experimental approach towards a historiography of alchemy. [REVIEW]Anna Marie Roos - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4b):787-789.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Preface.The Editors The Editors - 1985 - History of Political Thought 6 (1):xiii.

Add more references