Architecture and sites: a lesson from the categorization of artworks

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):5-24 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several contemporary architects have designed architectural objects that are closely linked to their particular sites. An in-depth study of the relevant relationship holding between those objects and their sites is, however, missing. This paper addresses the issue, arguing that those architectural objects are akin to works of site-specific art. In section (1), I introduce the topic of the paper. In section (2), I critically analyse the debate on the categorisation of artworks as site-specific. In section (3), I apply to architecture the lesson learned from the analysis of the art debate.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-05

Downloads
310 (#87,912)

6 months
64 (#88,861)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elisa Caldarola
University of Turin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Intrinsic vs. extrinsic properties.Dan Marshall & Brian Weatherson - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Beyond Art.Dominic Lopes - 2014 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
How Buildings Mean.Nelson Goodman - 1985 - Critical Inquiry 11 (4):642-653.
Philosophy of Architecture.Saul Fisher - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 8 references / Add more references