Smart drugs for cognitive enhancement: ethical and pragmatic considerations in the era of cosmetic neurology

Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):611-615 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reports in the popular press suggest that smart drugs or “nootropics” such as methylphenidate, modafinil and piracetam are increasingly being used by the healthy to augment cognitive ability. Although current nootropics offer only modest improvements in cognitive performance, it appears likely that more effective compounds will be developed in the future and that their off-label use will increase. One sphere in which the use of these drugs may be commonplace is by healthy students within academia. This article reviews the ethical and pragmatic implications of nootropic use in academia by drawing parallels with issues relevant to the drugs in sport debate. It is often argued that performance-enhancing drugs should be prohibited because they create an uneven playing field. However, this appears dubious given that “unfair” advantages are already ubiquitous and generally tolerated by society. There are concerns that widespread use will indirectly coerce non-users also to employ nootropics in order to remain competitive. However, to restrict the autonomy of all people for fear that it may influence the actions of some is untenable. The use of potentially harmful drugs for the purposes of enhancement rather than treatment is often seen as unjustified, and libertarian approaches generally champion the rights of the individual in deciding if these risks are acceptable. Finally, whether the prohibition of nootropics can be effectively enforced is doubtful. As nootropics use becomes widespread among students in the future, discussion of this issue will become more pressing in the years to come.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
105 (#154,235)

6 months
7 (#176,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The promise and predicament of cosmetic neurology.Anjan Chatterjee - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (2):110-113.
On the argument that enhancement is "cheating".M. Schermer - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):85-88.
The presumption against direct manipulation.N. Levy - forthcoming - Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
The Coercive Power of Drugs in Sports.Thomas H. Murray - 1983 - Hastings Center Report 13 (4):24-30.

View all 11 references / Add more references