Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):447-474 (2007)
Abstract |
In this paper my concern is to evaluate a particular answer to the question of how we acquire mastery of the syntax of our first language. According to this answer children learn syntax by means of scientific investigation. Alison Gopnik has recently championed this idea as an extension of what she calls the ‘theory theory’, a well established approach to cognitive development in developntental psychology. I will argue against this extension of the theory theory. The general thrust of my objection is that at the point at which children are acquiring knowledge of syntax they are not in a position to engage in far-reaching scientific investigation. Or, if they are, there are no mechanisms in place to ensure that their scientific investigations will generate a common body of knowledge so making linguistic convergence a mystery. That this is so is a product of two salient features of scientific confirmation. I will conclude that my objections to the theory theory put pressure on learning theories in general
|
Keywords | Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 1333-1108 |
DOI | croatjphil2007737 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Language and the Learning Curve: A New Theory of Syntactic Development.Anat Ninio - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
The Theory Theory Thrice Over: The Child as Scientist, Superscientist or Social Institution?A. M. & M. S. - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):117-132.
Psychological Concept Acquisition.Theodore Bach - 2013 - In N. Payette (ed.), Connected Minds: Cognition and Interaction in the Social World. Cambridge Scholars Press.
On the Evidence for Prelinguistic Concepts.Christopher Gauker - 2005 - Theoria-Revista De Teoria Historia y Fundamentos De La Ciencia 20 (3):287-297.
Paradigm Shifts, Scientific Revolutions, and the Unit of Scientific Change: Towards a Post-Kuhnian Theory of Types of Scientific Development.Paul C. L. Tang - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:125 - 136.
Knowledge, Language and Learning.Rama Kant Agnihotri & Hriday Kant Dewan (eds.) - 2010 - Macmillan Publishers India.
Reflection on Rules in Science: An Invisible-Hand Perspective.Thomas C. Leonard - 2002 - Journal of Economic Methodology 9 (2):141-168.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-01-09
Total views
31 ( #368,587 of 2,507,351 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,351 )
2011-01-09
Total views
31 ( #368,587 of 2,507,351 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,351 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads