Against the moral considerability of ecosystems

Environmental Ethics 10 (3):195-216 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Are ecosystems morally considerable-that is, do we owe it to them to protect their “interests”? Many environmental ethicists, impressed by the way that individual nonsentient organisms such as plants tenaciously pursue their own biological goals, have concluded that we should extend moral considerability far enough to include such organisms. There is a pitfall in the ecosystem-to-organism analogy, however. We must distinguish a system’s genuine goals from the incidental effects, or byproducts, of the behavior of that system’s parts. Goals seem capable of giving rise to interests; byproducts do not. It is hard to see how whole ecosystems can be genuinely goal-directed unless group selection occurs at the community level. Currently, mainstream ecological and evolutionary theory is individualistic. From such a theory it follows that the apparent goals of ecosystems are mere byproducts and, as such, cannot ground moral considerability

Other Versions

reprint Cahen, Harley (2002) "Against the Moral Considerability of Ecosystems". In Light, Andrew, Holmes Rolston, I. I. I., Environmental Ethics: An Anthology, pp. 114--128: Wiley (2002)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Humans and the Soil.Daniel C. Fouke - 2011 - Environmental Ethics 33 (2):147-161.
The moral considerability of invasive transgenic animals.Benjamin Hale - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (4):337-366.
The Value of Ecosystem Health.J. Baird Callicott - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (4):345 - 361.
Are mere things morally considerable?W. Murray Hunt - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (1):59-65.
How Ecological Collectives Are Morally Considerable.J. Baird Callicott - 2015 - In Stephen Mark Gardiner & Allen Thompson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics. Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
518 (#54,516)

6 months
30 (#117,863)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The good of non-sentient entities: Organisms, artifacts, and synthetic biology.John Basl & Ronald Sandler - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):697-705.
Gratitude to Nature.Tony Manela - 2018 - Environmental Values 27 (6):623-644.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references