For a grounded conception of wilderness and more wilderness on the ground

Ethics and the Environment 6 (1):1-17 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Recently a number of influential academic environmentalists have spoken out against wilderness, most prominently William Cronon and J. Baird Callicott. This is odd, given that these writers seem to support two cornerstone positions of environmentalism as it has developed over the past twenty years: first, the view articulated within environmental ethics that wild, nonhuman nature, or at least some parts of it, has intrinsic or inherent value; second, the understanding developed within conservation biology that we have entered a period of massive anthropogenic biodiversity loss and that landscape-level habitat preservation is essential for combating this. I argue here that Cronon and Callicott are wrong. In fact, an ethics of respect for nonhuman nature and an informed, scientific understanding of what is necessary to preserve it do strongly support increased wilderness preservation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Possibility of Managing for Wilderness.David Graham Henderson - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (4):413-429.
What “Wilderness” in Frontier Ecosystems?J. Baird Callicott - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (3):235-249.
Some Political Problems for Rewilding Nature.John Hintz - 2007 - Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (2):177 – 216.
On Wilderness and People: A View From Mount Marcy.Wayne Ouderkirk - 2003 - Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):15 – 32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#263,250)

6 months
1 (#417,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Cafaro
Colorado State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations