| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
Pseudoskepticism, which typically is portraying someone's work as despicable with scientifically unsound polemics, is a modern day threat to the traditional standard
of discussion in science and popular science. This essay gives seven tell-tale signs by which pseudoskepticism can be recognized.
|
| Keywords | peer review academic ethics pseudoskepticism |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Scientific Misconduct: Three Forms That Directly Harm Others as the Modus Operandi of Mill’s Tyranny of the Prevailing Opinion.Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):41-54.
Ethical Issues in Journal Peer-Review.J. Angelo Corlett - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (4):355-366.
Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (4):333-346.
The Ethics of Inquiry, Scientific Belief, and Public Discourse.Lawrence Torcello - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (3):197-215.
Promoting F.A.I.T.H. In Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review. [REVIEW]Leigh Turner - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-Publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Aceil Al-Khatib & Judit Dobránszki - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (4):1213-1226.
The Principles and Practices of Peer Review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Promoting Faith in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review.Turner Leigh - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Advances in Peer Review Research: An Introduction.Arthur E. Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):3-10.
Academic Skepticism in Early Modern Philosophy.Jose Raimundo Maia Neto - 1997 - Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (2):199-220.
Advances in Peer Review Research: An Introduction.Arthur E. Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):3-10.
The Ethics of Academic Journal Editing.J. Angelo Corlett - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):205-209.
A Social Epistemological Inquiry Into Biases in Journal Peer Review.Saana Jukola - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (1):124-148.
The Ethics of Belief, Cognition, and Climate Change Pseudoskepticism: Implications for Public Discourse.Lawrence Torcello - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1):19-48.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-09-08
Total views
570 ( #14,869 of 2,507,706 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
122 ( #5,617 of 2,507,706 )
2018-09-08
Total views
570 ( #14,869 of 2,507,706 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
122 ( #5,617 of 2,507,706 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
