Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Pseudoskepticism, which typically is portraying someone's work as despicable with scientifically unsound polemics, is a modern day threat to the traditional standard of discussion in science and popular science. This essay gives seven tell-tale signs by which pseudoskepticism can be recognized.
Keywords peer review  academic ethics  pseudoskepticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Trouble with Pseudoskepticism.Lawrence Torcello - 2012 - Skeptical Inquirer 36 (3).
Ethical Issues in Journal Peer-Review.J. Angelo Corlett - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (4):355-366.
The Principles and Practices of Peer Review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Advances in Peer Review Research: An Introduction.Arthur E. Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):3-10.
Academic Skepticism in Early Modern Philosophy.Jose Raimundo Maia Neto - 1997 - Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (2):199-220.
Advances in Peer Review Research: An Introduction.Arthur E. Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):3-10.
The Ethics of Academic Journal Editing.J. Angelo Corlett - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):205-209.


Added to PP index

Total views
570 ( #14,869 of 2,507,706 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
122 ( #5,617 of 2,507,706 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes