Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):41-54 (2014)

Authors
Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Abstract
Scientific misconduct is usually assumed to be self-serving. This paper, however, proposes to distinguish between two types of scientific misconduct: ‘type one scientific misconduct’ is self-serving and leads to falsely positive conclusions about one’s own work, while ‘type two scientific misconduct’ is other-harming and leads to falsely negative conclusions about someone else’s work. The focus is then on the latter type, and three known issues are identified as specific forms of such scientific misconduct: biased quality assessment, smear, and officially condoning scientific misconduct. These concern the improper ways how challenges of the prevailing opinion are thwarted in the modern world. The central issue is pseudoskepticism: uttering negative conclusions about someone else’s work that are downright false. It is argued that this may be an emotional response, rather than a calculated strategic action. Recommendations for educative and punitive measures are given to prevent and to deal with these three forms of scientific misconduct
Keywords Scientific misconduct  Discourse ethics  Pseudoskepticism  Biased refereeing  Smear  Integrity committees  Peer review
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-013-9433-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Social Theory and Social Structure.Lawrence Haworth - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (44):345-346.
Social Theory and Social Structure.Lawrence Haworth - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (1):53-53.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Misconduct in Science and the German Law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
The American Experience: Lessons Learned. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):95-107.
How to Blow the Whistle and Still Have a Career Afterwards.C. K. Gunsalus - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):51-64.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
41 ( #276,375 of 2,505,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes