Comment on Yli-Vakkuri and Hawthorne, Narrow Content

Philosophical Studies 178 (9):3017-3026 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This comment mainly examines Yli-Vakkuri and Hawthorne’s preferred framework for examining whether narrow content is viable, arguing that their framework is not well-suited to the task; once a more traditional framework is adopted, Y&H’s case against internalism is strengthened.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2021

DOI

10.1007/s11098-020-01548-2

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The nature of content: a critique of Yli-Vakkuri and Hawthorne.Sarah Sawyer - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Narrow Content, by Juhani Yli-Vakkuri and John Hawthorne. [REVIEW]Sarah Sawyer - 2019 - Mind 128 (511):976-984.
Narrow Content.Juhani Yli-Vakkuri & John Hawthorne - 2018 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Hawthorne.
There is no viable notion of narrow content.Sarah Sawyer - 2007 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan D. Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 20-34.
Narrow content.Robert Stalnaker - 1990 - In C. Anthony Anderson & Joseph Owens (eds.), Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind. Stanford: Csli.
How narrow is narrow content?François Recanati - 1994 - Dialectica 48 (3-4):209-29.
Narrow mental content.Curtis Brown - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Narrow content: Fodor's folly.Fred Adams, David Drebushenko, Gary Fuller & Robert Stecker - 1990 - Mind and Language 5 (3):213-29.
What narrow content is not.Ned Block - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer (ed.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Real narrow content.Uriah Kriegel - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (3):304–328.
An argument for holism.Ned Block - 1995 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:151-70.
How Narrow is Narrow Content?François Recanati - 1994 - Dialectica 48 (3-4):209-229.
In defense of social content.John Biro - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 67 (3):277-93.
How “Meaning” became “Narrow Content”.Paweł Grabarczyk - 2016 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 46 (1):155-171.
Narrow Content: Motivations and Problems.Scott Francis Walden - 1994 - Dissertation, City University of New York

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-11

Downloads
653 (#24,887)

6 months
113 (#32,617)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Byrne
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

Narrow mental content.Curtis Brown - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reply to Byrne.Juhani Yli-Vakkuri & John Hawthorne - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (9):3049-3054.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Relativism and Monadic Truth.Herman Cappelen & John Hawthorne - 2009 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by John Hawthorne.
The logical form of action sentences.Donald Davidson - 1967 - In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 81--95.
Possible worlds.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1976 - Noûs 10 (1):65-75.

View all 11 references / Add more references