Wilhelm Dilthey's Philosophy of Historical Understanding [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 24 (2):347-348 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although Dilthey is increasingly recognized as a seminal philosopher whose thought finds significant expression in the works of Heidegger, Husserl, Jaspers, Mannheim, Weber, Spranger, Simmel, Troeltsch, and Buber, his writings are available in English in only the scantiest of excerpts. Book-size English commentaries on Dilthey can be counted without exhausting the fingers of one hand. The present, slim volume would, therefore, be of interest for no other reason than that it adds a reference to an all-too skimpy library. Fortunately, it is of value for much better reasons. What Tuttle has attempted is the first systematic exposition of Dilthey's life-long attempt to establish an objectively valid basis for his theory of Verstehen and Nacherlebnis.. This may belie the subtitle of the book, but it can hardly be denied that the exposition is at least equal in importance to the critical analysis which follows it. The reconstruction of Dilthey's arguments consists of a description of: his concept of the special nature of human life which permits the subject and object of historical knowledge to be the same; the original descriptive psychology which Dilthey worked out as the basis for the study of history and of all the human sciences; his somewhat equivocal abandonment of psychology because of its ahistorical and law-like character in favor of an emphasis on empirical life assertions which are internalized by the method of Verstehen; his notion of human nature and the tension between its historically changing aspect and its unchanging epistemological aspect; the role of motives in Dilthey's system as causes of historical action; and his theory of ideal types as a methodological device for generalizing without having to utilize the causal explanations of natural science. The book begins and ends on the same note; namely, that Dilthey is unable to verify that the re-experience of the historian is actually a duplicate of the experience of the historical agent. But in between the opening statement and its repetition at the end, a wealth of insight into Dilthey's thought is provided.--H. B.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dilthey and the narrative of history.Jacob Owensby - 1997 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Dilthey, philosopher of the human studies.Rudolf A. Makkreel - 1975 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
'Hypotheses, everywhere only hypotheses!': on some contexts of Dilthey's critique of explanatory psychology.Uljana Feest - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (1):43-62.
Wilhelm Dilthey: the critique of historical reason.Michael Ermarth - 1978 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Historical optimism: Wilhelm Dilthey.Ludwig Stein - 1924 - Philosophical Review 33 (4):329-344.
Wilhelm Dilthey’s Research and the Current Struggle for a Historical Worldview.Martin Heidegger - 2009 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 9:235-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
29 (#536,973)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references