Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):171-184 (2003)

The often-emphasized tension between the singularity of the patient and technical–scientific reproducibility in medicine cannot be resolved without a discussion of the epistemological and methodological status of the human sciences. On the one hand, the rules concerning human action are analogous to the scientific laws of nature. They are de facto sufficiently stable to allow predictions and explanations similar to those of experimental sciences. From this point of view, it is only a trivial truth, but still a methodological irrelevancy, that the patient and the doctor–patient relationship represent an ontologically irreproducible reality. On the other hand, however, one can never exclude that one can fail in the application of "laws" of the human sciences to the individual patient, for such laws are by no means wholly separated from a patient's personal-hermeneutic mediation, and can at any time be revoked by becoming aware of them. This requires a synergistic collaboration of clinical and statistical methods, and shows a methodologically relevant sense in which one cannot disregard the singularity of the patient. The reason for the crucial role of the patient's singularity in medicine is every individual patient's capacity to revoke, in principle, routines and quasi-automatisms, even though the personal mediation by the patient's consciousness de facto changes them in such a small degree that predictions and explanations modeled in experimental science remain possible
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10202-002-0018-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Between Hype and Hope: What is Really at Stake with Personalized Medicine?Camille Abettan - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (3):423-430.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Medicine as a Human Science.Marco Buzzoni - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (1):79-94.
Informed Consent: Patient's Right or Patient's Duty?Richard T. Hull - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.
The Noncompliant Patient: A Kantian and Levinasian Response.P. Burcher - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):74-89.
Medicine as a Trade.Marian Rabinowitz - 1980 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (3):255-261.
Competition and the Patient-Centered Ethic.George W. Rainbolt - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):85-99.
Narrative Unity and Clinical Judgment.Thomas A. Long - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
Postmodernist Theory and the Physician-Patient Relationship.Nelly Tsouyopoulos - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (3).
In Defense of Paternalism.Erich H. Loewy - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):445-468.
Viktor Emil Von Gebsattel on the Doctor-Patient Relationship.Jos V. M. Welie - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (1).


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #515,686 of 2,519,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes