Reactive Rules Alone Cannot Construct Cognition

Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):34-35 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Exploration of the Functional Properties of Interaction: Computer Models and Pointers for Theory” by Etienne B. Roesch, Matthew Spencer, Slawomir J. Nasuto, Thomas Tanay & J. Mark Bishop. Upshot: Although the authors investigate a form of distributed swarm intelligence and solve some problems with it – including sorting and summing – the major goal, which is constructing cognition, cannot be achieved by this approach alone. I propose that anticipatory mechanisms have the potential to construct cognition and may very well be combined with swarm intelligence principles

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Single Agents Can Be Constructivist too.O. L. Georgeon & S. Hassas - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):40-42.
Self-organization in Brains.P. Cariani - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):35-38.
The Mind Is Not In the Brain.J. Stewart - 2008 - Constructivist Foundations 4 (1):17-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-17

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references