‘He who helps the guilty, shares the crime’? INGOs, moral narcissism and complicity in wrongdoing

Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (5):299-304 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Humanitarian organisations often work alongside those responsible for serious wrongdoing. In these circumstances, accusations of moral complicity are sometimes levelled at decision makers. These accusations can carry a strong if unfocused moral charge and are frequently the source of significant moral unease. In this paper, we explore the meaning and usefulness of complicity and its relation to moral accountability. We also examine the impact of concerns about complicity on the motivation of humanitarian staff and the risk that complicity may lead to a retreat into moral narcissism. Moral narcissism is the possibility that where humanitarian actors inadvertently become implicated in wrongdoing, they may focus more on their image as self-consciously good actors than on the interests of potential beneficiaries. Moral narcissism can be triggered where accusations of complicity are made and can slew decision making. We look at three interventions by Médecins Sans Frontières that gave rise to questions of complicity. We question its decision-guiding usefulness. Drawing on recent thought, we suggest that complicity can helpfully draw attention to the presence of moral conflict and to the way International Non-Governmental Organisations can be drawn into unintentional wrongdoing. We acknowledge the moral challenge that complicity presents to humanitarian staff but argue that complicity does not help INGOs make tough decisions in morally compromising situations as to whether they should continue with an intervention or pull out.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

XIV. Don't Worry, Feel Guilty.J. David Velleman - 2003 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 52:235-248.
Individual Complicity in Collective Wrongdoing.Brian Lawson - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):227-243.
Complicity: That Moral Monster, Troubling Matters.Peter A. French - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):575-589.
Exploring Complicity: Concept, Cases and Critique.Michael Neu, Robin Dunford & Afxentis Afxentiou (eds.) - 2016 - New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Virtuous Condonation.Geoffrey Scarre - 2014 - Philosophical Papers 43 (3):405-428.
The Possibility of an Ongoing Moral Catastrophe.Evan G. Williams - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5):971-982.
Market complicity and Christian ethics.Albino Barrera - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Some Theses on Desert.Randolph Clarke - 2013 - Philosophical Explorations 16 (2):153-64.
Intending to Aid.Gideon Yaffe - 2014 - Law and Philosophy 33 (1):1-40.
How should INGOs allocate resources?Scott Wisor - 2012 - Ethics and Global Politics 5 (1):27-48.
Complicity and the rwandan genocide.Larry May - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (2):135-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-19

Downloads
25 (#542,984)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Moral Luck.B. A. O. Williams & T. Nagel - 1976 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 50 (1):115-152.
Moral Luck.B. A. O. Williams & T. Nagel - 1976 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 50:115 - 151.
Complicity: That Moral Monster, Troubling Matters.Peter A. French - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):575-589.

Add more references