Jonathan Buttaci
Catholic University of America
One of the most highly debated passages in Aristotle is his doctrine of the nous poiētikos of de Anima III.5. The interpretations of its precise nature and operation that were given by ancient and medieval commentators abound also today. With few exceptions, however, present-day interpretations disagree with the ancients and others on the logic of the passage. In particular, while most ancient and medieval commentators agree that there are three intellects or intellectual powers on scene in the passage, most contemporary interpreters assume that there are only two, identifying the pathētikos nous at the end of III.5 with the intellect described in III.4. In this paper I argue that this assumption is wrong, and that although the text is underdetermined in several ways, it is not so in this respect. The text, taken with other relevant passages, demands that the pathētikos nous be different from the intellect described in III.4
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/acpaproc201441416
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Self-Forming Vessel: Aristotle, Plasticity, and the Developing Nature of the Intellect.S. F. Kislev - 2020 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 51 (3):259-274.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Matter and Form of Maimonides' Guide.Josef Stern - 2013 - Harvard University Press.
Style and Pedagogy in Plato and Aristotle.Harry Lesser - 1982 - Philosophy 57 (221):388 - 394.
Descartes No Es Un Conceptualista.Amy Karofsky - 2002 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 14 (2):191-209.
Founders of Thought.R. M. Hare, Jonathan Barnes & Henry Chadwick (eds.) - 1982 - Oxford University Press.
God, Modalities, and Conceptualism.Amy Karofsky - 2003 - Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):257-271.
Sensation in Aristotle: Some Problematic Contemporary Interpretations and a Medieval Solution.Turner C. Nevitt - 2013 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 87:195-211.
Aristotle, the Common Good, and Us.V. Bradley Lewis - 2013 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 87:69-88.
Aristotle.J. M. E. Moravcsik - 1967 - Garden City, N.Y., Anchor Books.


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #411,416 of 2,462,254 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #144,199 of 2,462,254 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes