International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):141 - 153 (2008)
AbstractThis article addresses some issues concerning the relation between religious beliefs and the fruits of those beliefs, where ‘fruits’ implies certain relevant forms of behaviour and affective attitudes. My primary aim is to elucidate the dispute between D. Z. Phillips and theological realists, emphasizing the extent to which this dispute is symptomatic of a deeper disagreement over how words acquire their meanings. In the course of doing so, I highlight an important difference between two alternative realist claims, exemplified by Trigg and Hick respectively, and draw attention to an infelicity in Phillips’ way of presenting his case.
Similar books and articles
D. Z. Phillips on Christian immortality.Patrick Horn - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (1):39-53.
D. Z. Phillips' contemplations on religion and literature.Mikel Burley - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (1):21-37.
Phillips and eternal life: A response to Mikel Burley.John Haldane - 2008 - Philosophical Investigations 31 (3):252–260.
Phillips and eternal life: A response to Haldane.Mikel Burley - 2008 - Philosophical Investigations 31 (3):237–251.
On blanket statements about the epistemic effects of religious diversity.Andrew Koehl - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (4):395-414.
Rorty, Religious Beliefs, and Pragmatism.James Flaherty - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (2):175-185.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy.Peter Michael Stephan Hacker - 1996 - Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy.P. M. S. Hacker - 1996 - Philosophy 73 (283):132-134.