Hintikka et Sandu versus Frege in re Arbitrary Functions

Philosophia Mathematica 1 (1):50-65 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hintikka and Sandu have recently claimed that Frege's notion of function was substantially narrower than that prevailing in real analysis today. In the present note, their textual evidence for this claim is examined in the light of relevant historical and biographical background and judged insufficient.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
74 (#218,358)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Burgess
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Frege's proof of referentiality.Øystein Linnebo - 2004 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 45 (2):73-98.
Frege and his groups.Tuomo Aho - 1998 - History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (3):137-151.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers. [REVIEW]Cassius J. Keyser - 1916 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 13 (25):697-697.

Add more references