Getting over Atomism: Functional Decomposition in Complex Neural Systems

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (3):743-772 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Functional decomposition is an important goal in the life sciences, and is central to mechanistic explanation and explanatory reduction. A growing literature in philosophy of science, however, has challenged decomposition-based notions of explanation. ‘Holists’ posit that complex systems exhibit context-sensitivity, dynamic interaction, and network dependence, and that these properties undermine decomposition. They then infer from the failure of decomposition to the failure of mechanistic explanation and reduction. I argue that complexity, so construed, is only incompatible with one notion of decomposition, which I call ‘atomism’, and not with decomposition writ large. Atomism posits that function ascriptions must be made to parts with minimal reference to the surrounding system. Complexity does indeed falsify atomism, but I contend that there is a weaker, ‘contextualist’ notion of decomposition that is fully compatible with the properties that holists cite. Contextualism suggests that the function of parts can shift with external context, and that interactions with other parts might help determine their context-appropriate functions. This still admits of functional decomposition within a given context. I will give examples based on the notion of oscillatory multiplexing in systems neuroscience. If contextualism is feasible, then holist inferences are faulty—one cannot infer from the presence of complexity to the failure of decomposition, mechanism, and reductionism.

Similar books and articles

Functional Independence and Cognitive Architecture.Vincent Bergeron - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3):817-836.
Cell decomposition for P‐minimal fields.Marie-Hélène Mourgues - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (5):487-492.
Further notes on cell decomposition in closed ordered differential fields.Cédric Rivière - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 159 (1-2):100-110.
Incommensurability and Rationality in Engineering Design.Dingmar van Eck - 2011 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15 (2):118-136.
SCE-Cell Decomposition and OCP in Weakly O-Minimal Structures.Jafar S. Eivazloo & Somayyeh Tari - 2016 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 57 (3):399-410.
Decomposition and analysis in Frege’s Grundgesetze.Gregory Landini - 1996 - History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):121-139.
Trees and diagrams of decomposition.Anita Wasilewska - 1985 - Studia Logica 44 (2):139 - 158.
Function and organization: comparing the mechanisms of protein synthesis and natural selection.Phyllis McKay Illari & Jon Williamson - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (3):279-291.


Added to PP

645 (#25,201)

6 months
161 (#17,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Burnston
Tulane University

References found in this work

Thinking about mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.
Explaining the Brain.Carl F. Craver - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Explanation: a mechanist alternative.William Bechtel & Adele Abrahamsen - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (2):421-441.
The Architecture of Complexity.Herbert A. Simon - 1962 - Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106.

View all 70 references / Add more references