Agriculture and Human Values 29 (2):247-258 (2012)
Abstract |
The transnational agrarian movement La Via Campesina (LVC) seeks to reestablish food sovereignty authority within national borders by removing agriculture from the WTO system. The WTO is a membership organization of participating nation-states that have agreed to abide by the rules of the WTO governance regime. Nominally, at least, changes in these governance rules must be approved by the nation-state members. This paper examines the extent to which South Korean affiliate organizations of LVC, the Korean Peasant League and the Korean Women Peasants Association, have been successful in placing food sovereignty issues on the national agri-food policy agenda in South Korea that challenge the WTO’s neoliberal global governance regime for agriculture. In effect, the success of transnational movements like LVC in challenging global institutions may rest on how well their member affiliates are able to play domestic agri-food politics
|
Keywords | Food sovereignty Korean Peasant League Korean Women Peasants Association La Via Campesina South Korea Transnational agrarian movements WTO |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10460-011-9335-9 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Chisan-Chisho Movement: Japanese Local Food Movement and its Challenges. [REVIEW]Aya Hirata Kimura & Mima Nishiyama - 2008 - Agriculture and Human Values 25 (1):49-64.
Transnational Participatory Democracy in Action: The Case of la Via Campesina.Michael Menser - 2008 - Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (1):20–41.
Micromobilization and Suicide Protest in South Korea, 1970-2004.Hyojoung Kim - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (2):543-578.
Citations of this work BETA
Food Sovereignty: The Debate, the Deadlock, and a Suggested Detour. [REVIEW]Otto Hospes - 2014 - Agriculture and Human Values 31 (1):119-130.
South and/or North: An Indigenous Seed Movement in South Korea and the Multiple Bases of Food Sovereignty.Hyejin Kim - 2021 - Agriculture and Human Values 39 (2):521-533.
Sustainability Transitions in Agri-Food Systems: Insights From South Korea’s Universal Free, Eco-Friendly School Lunch Program.Jennifer E. Gaddis & June Jeon - 2020 - Agriculture and Human Values 37 (4):1055-1071.
Deconstructing Homegardens: Food Security and Sovereignty in Northern Nicaragua.Karie Boone & Peter Leigh Taylor - 2016 - Agriculture and Human Values 33 (2):239-255.
Similar books and articles
Food Sovereignty: The Debate, the Deadlock, and a Suggested Detour. [REVIEW]Otto Hospes - 2014 - Agriculture and Human Values 31 (1):119-130.
Meeting Consumer Concerns for Food Safety in South Korea: The Importance of Food Safety and Ethics in a Globalizing Market. [REVIEW]Renee B. Kim - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (2):141-152.
Framing Transformation: The Counter-Hegemonic Potential of Food Sovereignty in the US Context. [REVIEW]Madeleine Fairbairn - 2012 - Agriculture and Human Values 29 (2):217-230.
Food Sovereignty or the Human Right to Adequate Food: Which Concept Serves Better as International Development Policy for Global Hunger and Poverty Reduction? [REVIEW]Tina D. Beuchelt & Detlef Virchow - 2012 - Agriculture and Human Values 29 (2):259-273.
Food Sovereignty in US Food Movements: Radical Visions and Neoliberal Constraints.Alison Hope Alkon & Teresa Marie Mares - 2012 - Agriculture and Human Values 29 (3):347-359.
Food Sovereignty, Urban Food Access, and Food Activism: Contemplating the Connections Through Examples From Chicago. [REVIEW]Daniel R. Block, Noel Chávez, Erika Allen & Dinah Ramirez - 2012 - Agriculture and Human Values 29 (2):203-215.
Standard Fare or Fairer Standards: Feminist Reflections on Agri-Food Governance. [REVIEW]Martha McMahon - 2011 - Agriculture and Human Values 28 (3):401-412.
Enabling Food Sovereignty and a Prosperous Future for Peasants by Understanding the Factors That Marginalise Peasants and Lead to Poverty and Hunger.Sofia Naranjo - 2012 - Agriculture and Human Values 29 (2):231-246.
From Food Justice to a Tool of the Status Quo: Three Sub-Movements Within Local Food.Ian Werkheiser & Samantha Noll - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (2):201-210.
What (If Anything) Can Developing Countries Learn From South Korea?Thomas M. Domjahn - 2013 - Asian Culture and History 5 (2):p16.
Competing Notions of Regionalism in South Korean Politics.David Hundt & Jaechun Kim - 2011 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 12 (2):251-266.
The Avalanche Perspective: Women Jurists in Korea 1952–2008. [REVIEW]Haesook Kim - 2009 - Feminist Legal Studies 17 (1):61-77.
Culture, Government and Development in South Korea.Luis Felipe Ramírez & Julio E. Rubio - 2010 - Asian Culture and History 2 (1):P71.
Right to Food; Right to Feed; Right to Be Fed. The Intersection of Women's Rights and the Right to Food.Penny Van Esterik - 1999 - Agriculture and Human Values 16 (2):225-232.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-23
Total views
34 ( #337,323 of 2,519,441 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,441 )
2013-11-23
Total views
34 ( #337,323 of 2,519,441 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,441 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads