E pluribus unum: Plural logic and set theory

Philosophia Mathematica 12 (3):193-221 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A new axiomatization of set theory, to be called Bernays-Boolos set theory, is introduced. Its background logic is the plural logic of Boolos, and its only positive set-theoretic existence axiom is a reflection principle of Bernays. It is a very simple system of axioms sufficient to obtain the usual axioms of ZFC, plus some large cardinals, and to reduce every question of plural logic to a question of set theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Second order logic or set theory?Jouko Väänänen - 2012 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (1):91-121.
Burgess on plural logic and set theory.Øystein Linnebo - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):79-93.
Logic, Logic, and Logic.George Boolos - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Edited by Richard C. Jeffrey.
Plural Quantification and the Iterative Concept of Set.Stephen Pollard - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:579-587.
Bernays and set theory.Akihiro Kanamori - 2009 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 15 (1):43-69.
Plural quantification and classes.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):67-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
229 (#84,165)

6 months
19 (#123,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Burgess
Princeton University

Citations of this work

The potential hierarchy of sets.Øystein Linnebo - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):205-228.
Plural quantification.Ø Linnebo - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Composition as a Kind of Identity.Phillip Bricker - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):264-294.
Varieties of Indefinite Extensibility.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2015 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 56 (1):147-166.

View all 41 citations / Add more citations