Democratic education: Aligning curriculum, pedagogy, assessment and school governance

In Philip Cam (ed.), Philosophy, democracy and education. Seoul, South Korea: pp. 101–120 (2003)

Authors
Gilbert Burgh
University of Queensland
Abstract
Matthew Lipman claims that the community of inquiry is an exemplar of democracy in action. To many proponents the community of inquiry is considered invaluable for achieving desirable social and political ends through education for democracy. But what sort of democracy should we be educating for? In this paper I outline three models of democracy: the liberal model, which emphasises rights and duties, and draws upon pre-political assumptions about freedom; communitarianism, which focuses on identity and participation in the creation of political ends; and deliberative self-governance, whereby citizens deliberatively shape their collective lives in public forums—at various levels of government and in different political and social arenas. I argue that some kind of deliberative democracy is defensible as a preliminary justification for how citizens might shape their lives, and therefore compatible with other forms of democracy, insofar as they can result from democratic deliberations. Acceptance of such a view raises further questions about the purpose or aims of education consistent with this conception of democracy. I contend that it requires an educational model that is committed to aligning curriculum, pedagogy, assessment and school governance to produce a transformational environment that will inform our structures—a commitment to democratic education and not merely education for democracy. Lipman goes part of the way to achieving these ends, but learning how to be proficient at democratic decision-making is like all tasks children and adolescents learn to perform. It involves action, understanding, and awareness of what counts as doing the task adequately.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,579
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Communities of Inquiry: Politics, Power and Group Dynamics.Gilbert Burgh & Mor Yorshansky - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (5):436-452.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Thinking in the Upper Secondary School.Viktor Gardelli - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 43:27-31.
Pedagogy and the Politics and Purposes of Higher Education.Melanie Walker - 2002 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 1 (1):43-58.
Is 'School Effectiveness' Anti-Democratic?Terry Wrigley - 2003 - British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (2):89 - 112.
Is ‘School Effectiveness’ Anti-Democratic?Terry Wrigley - 2003 - British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (2):89-112.
The Validity of National Curriculum Assessment.Gordon Stobart - 2001 - British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):26 - 39.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-10-13

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes