In this paper I challenge Merold Westphal’s claim that Jean-Luc Marion’s hermeneutical phenomenology is especially useful for theology. I argue that in spite of his explicit allegiance to Husserl’s “principle of all principles,” Marion fails to embody a commitment to phenomenological seeing in his analyses of revelation. In the sections of Being Given where he discusses revelation, Marion allows faith-based claims to bleed into his phenomenological analyses, resulting in what I call his ‘blurred vision’—the pretension that phenomenological seeing can be extended to theological matters. This pretension undermines Marion’s phenomenological aspirations, because it invests his analyses with a theological content that phenomenological intuition cannot account for or clarify. At the same time, this blurring of the line between theology and phenomenology also makes Marion’s work theologically ineffective. For it furnishes the theologian and believer with the false assurance that faith-based commitments can be grounded in phenomenological knowledge—a claim that he simply cannot make good on. In light of these problems, I propose an alternative Heideggerian approach that maintains the boundary between philosophical and theological discourse and thereby safeguards the integrity of both.
Keywords Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-010-9226-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
The Idea of the Holy.R. Otto - 1958 - Oxford University Press USA.
Pathmarks.Martin Heidegger (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Religion and Scientism: A Shared Cognitive Conundrum.Matthew Burch - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (3):225-241.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Blurred Vision: Marion on the 'Possibility' of Revelation. [REVIEW]Matthew I. Burch - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):157 - 171.
Givenness and Revelation.Jean-Luc Marion - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
Traces of Reduction: Marion and Heidegger on the Phenomenon of Religion.Brian Rogers - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (2):184-205.
Vision and Voice: Phenomenology and Theology in the Work of Jean-Luc Marion. [REVIEW]Merold Westphal - 2006 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60 (1/3):117 - 137.
Blurred Vision and the Transparency of Experience.Michael Pace - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):328–354.
Blur.Keith Allen - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):257-273.
Translucent Experiences.A. D. Smith - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (2):197--212.
Revelation in Our Knowledge of God.Richard Swinburne - 1992 - In Kelly James Clark (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
The Trinity in Universal Revelation.Richard Viladesau - 1990 - Philosophy and Theology 4 (4):317-334.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #554,676 of 2,498,179 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,179 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes