Transdisciplinarity: The New Challenge for Biomedical Research

Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 21 (4):253-266 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

During the past decade, patient participation became an important issue in the medical field, and patient participation in biomedical research processes is increasingly called for. One of the arguments for this refers to the specific kind of knowledge, called experiential knowledge, patients could contribute. Until now, participation of patients in biomedical research has been rare, and integration of patients’ experiential knowledge with scientific knowledge—in the few cases it takes place—occurs implicitly and on an ad hoc basis. This is illustrated by describing and analyzing the activities of the German patient group on retinitis pigmentosa. The authors argue that to be able to optimize the use of experiential knowledge of patients in biomedical research, a systematic approach is required. Transdisciplinary research provides such an approach, systematically, explicitly, and deliberately integrating knowledge from different scientific and nonscientific sources. In this article, the concept of transdisciplinarity is elaborated upon. The authors propose a possible procedure, identify necessary conditions and skills, and evaluate the feasibility of its implementation and institutionalization. Finally, the authors introduce a recent research project to further investigate and implement transdisciplinary research in the biomedical field.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Obligation to Participate in Biomedical Research.G. Owen Schaefer, Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Alan Wertheimer - 2009 - Journal of the American Medical Association 302 (1):67-72.
Trust me, I’m a researcher!: The role of trust in biomedical research.Angeliki Kerasidou - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (1):43-50.
Towards precision medicine; a new biomedical cosmology.M. W. Vegter - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (4):443-456.
“What Is PER?” Patient Engagement in Research as a Hit.Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon, Claudio Del Grande & Geneviève Rouleau - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 1 (2):59-62.
Ethics in Transdisciplinary Research: Reflections on the Implications of ‘Science with Society’.Jessica Cockburn & Georgina Cundill - 2018 - In Catriona Ida Macleod, Jacqueline Marx, Phindezwa Mnyaka & Gareth J. Treharne (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 81-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
7 (#1,351,854)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?