Note on a paper in tense logic

Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):215-218 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In [1, §4], my ‘proof’ that GH1 has the finite model property is incorrect; there are considerable obscurities towards the end of §1, particularly on p. 33; and I should have exhibited the finite models for GH1. In §1 of this paper I expand the analysis of the sub-directly irreducible models for GH1 which I give in §1 of [1]. In §2 I give a correct proof that GH1 has the finite model property. In §3 I exhibit these finite models as models on certain ordered sets.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#312,042)

6 months
9 (#460,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mathematical modal logic: A view of its evolution.Robert Goldblatt - 2003 - Journal of Applied Logic 1 (5-6):309-392.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references