God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist. By William Lane Craig and Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong [Book Review]

Heythrop Journal 50 (3):538-539 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00484_26.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, by William Lane Craig and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. [REVIEW]Nicholas Everitt - 2004 - Ars Disputandi 4.
God?:A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist: A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist.William Lane Craig & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2004 - Oxford University Press USA.
God?: a debate between a Christian and an atheist.William Lane Craig - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.
Is Goodness Without God Good Enough?: A Debate on Faith, Secularism, and Ethics.Louise Antony, William Lane Craig, John Hare, Donald C. Hubin, Paul Kurtz, C. Stephen Layman, Mark C. Murphy, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Richard Swinburne - 2008 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Is Ethical Naturalism more Plausible than Supernaturalism? A Reply to Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.Matthew Flannagan - 2012 - Philo 15 (1):19-37.
Review of Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. [REVIEW]Christian Miller - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
Review of Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development. [REVIEW]Christian Miller - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
Does 'ought' conversationally implicate 'can'?Bart Streumer - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):219–228.
Review - The New Intuitionism. [REVIEW]Dan Baras - 2012 - Metapsychology Online Reviews 16 (49).
Non-Inferential Moral Knowledge.Elizabeth Tropman - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (4):355-366.
Sinnott–Armstrong's moral scepticism.Mark T. Nelson - 2003 - Ratio 16 (1):63–82.
Book Review of Mark Johnson, Moral Imagination. [REVIEW]Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1994 - Mind 103 (411):381-384.
Review of Mark Johnson, Moral Imagination. [REVIEW]Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1994 - Mind 103 (411):381-384.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, ed., Moral Psychology (vol. 3). The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development. Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Christian Perring - 2010 - Philosophy in Review 30 (4):301-304.
Albert A. Anderson, Steven V. Hicks, and Lech Witkowski, eds., Mythos and Logos. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2004, 268 pp.(indexed). ISBN 90-420-1020, $73.00 (pb). Kevin Bales, Disposable People. Berkley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2004, 298 pp.(indexed). ISBN 0-520-24384-6, $17.95 (pb). [REVIEW]Mark Coeckelbergh, Mark T. Conard, Aeon J. Skoble, William Lane Craig & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2005 - Journal of Value Inquiry 39:139-141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
50 (#311,977)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references