Function and Design Revisited

In Functions: New Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 222-243 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several analyses of biological function — for example, those of Williams, Millikan, and Kitcher — identify an item’s function with what natural selection designed it to do. Allen and Bekoff have disagreed, claiming that natural design is a special case of biological function. I argue that Allen and Bekoff’s account of natural design is unduly restrictive and that it fails to mark a principled distinction between function and design. I distinguish two approaches to the phenomenon of natural design — the “trait-centered” approach of Allen and Bekoff and the “organism-centered” approach — and defend the latter. When design is understood according to the organism-centered approach, biological function and design are co-instantiated phenomena.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Function, Selection, and Design.David J. Buller (ed.) - 1999 - State University of New York Press.
Biological function, adaptation, and natural design.Colin Allen & Marc Bekoff - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (4):609-622.
Learning to design systems.Gary Metcalf - 2003 - World Futures 59 (1):21 – 36.
Oggetto d’arte quotidiana.Dario Russo - 2014 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 7 (1):109-117.
When reduction leads to construction: Design considerations in scientific methodology.Jeffry L. Ramsey - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (3):241 – 253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
14 (#995,846)

6 months
7 (#440,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David J. Buller
Northern Illinois University

Citations of this work

Reactive Attitudes as Communicative Entities.Coleen Macnamara - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):546-569.
The Machine Conception of the Organism in Development and Evolution: A Critical Analysis.Daniel J. Nicholson - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 48:162-174.
Blame, Communication, and Morally Responsible Agency.Coleen Macnamara - 2015 - In Randolph Clarke, Michael McKenna & Angela Smith (eds.), The Nature of Moral Responsibility: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 211-236.
Biological functions and natural selection: a reappraisal.Marc Artiga - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2):1-22.
Function and Teleology.Justin Garson - 2008 - In Sahorta Sarkar & Anya Plutynski (eds.), Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Blackwell. pp. 525-549.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references