- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What is cognition? angsty monism, permissive pluralism(s), and the future of cognitive science
Synthese (11):4191-4195 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Nanoscale: Issues and perspectives for the nano century. Edited by Nigel M. de S. Cameron and M. Ellen Mitchell. [REVIEW]Adam Henschke - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (1):73-74.
Evidential monism, evidential pluralism, or evidential contextualism? An introduction to evidential diversity in the social sciences.Yafeng Shan & Jon Williamson - 2022 - Synthese 200 (4):1-6.
Pluralistic ontology and theory reduction in the physical sciences.Fritz Rohrlich - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):295-312.
Pluralism in the Cognitive Sciences: Theoretical, Methodological or Explanatory?Сущин М.А - 2022 - Philosophy and Culture (Russian Journal) 10:117-131.
Monism in modern science and competitive pluralism : the case of economics.Frank Beckenbach - 2019 - In Samuel Decker, Wolfram Elsner & Svenja Flechtner (eds.), Advancing pluralism in teaching economics: international perspectives on a textbook science. New York: Routledge.
Explanations in cognitive science: unification versus pluralism.Marcin Miłkowski & Mateusz Hohol - 2020 - Synthese 199 (Suppl 1):1-17.
A Response to Núñez et al.'s “What Happened to Cognitive Science?”.Marjorie McShane, Selmer Bringsjord, James Hendler, Sergei Nirenburg & Ron Sun - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):914-917.
Cameron Shelley, Multiple Analogies in Science and Philosophy. [REVIEW]Sergio Cremaschi - 2004 - Pragmatics and Cognition 12 (2):389-395.
Reassessing Kuhn’s Theoretical Monism.K. Brad Wray - 2021 - In Interpreting Kuhn: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 222-237.
Can cognition be factorized into internal and external components?Timothy Williamson - 2006 - In Robert Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-07-24
Downloads
120 (#160,207)
6 months
12 (#218,655)
2017-07-24
Downloads
120 (#160,207)
6 months
12 (#218,655)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Autopoietic theory, enactivism, and their incommensurable marks of the cognitive.Mario Villalobos & Simón Palacios - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 1):71-87.
Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence 2017.Vincent C. Müller (ed.) - 2017 - Berlin: Springer.
A tese da mente estendida à luz do externismo ativo: Como tornar Otto responsivo a razões?Eros Moreira de Carvalho - 2020 - Trans/Form/Ação 43 (3):143-166.
Cognitivismos y conductismos.Sergio Barrera Rodríguez & Gerardo Gabriel Primero - 2020 - Scientia in Verba Magazine 6 (1):17-46.
References found in this work
The Bounds of Cognition.Frederick Adams & Kenneth Aizawa - 2008 - Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Kenneth Aizawa.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5d8df9484f-rkp68 uwo