Introduction of Implication and Generalization in Axiomatic Calculi

Abstract

of implication and generalization rules have a close relationship, for which there is a key idea for clarifying how they are connected: varying objects. Varying objects trace how generalization rules are used along a demonstration in an axiomatic calculus. Some ways for introducing implication and for generalization are presented here, taking into account some basic properties that calculi can have.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Once more to dissolve the ravens.Fred Wilson - 1995 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (2):135 – 146.
Geach on Generalization.Charles Sayward - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (2):221-.
‘Everyone’, consequences, and generalization arguments.J. Howard Sobel - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):373-404.
Gentzen's proof systems: byproducts in a work of genius.Jan von Plato - 2012 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (3):313-367.
The true function of the generalization argument.Roland Paul Blum - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):274 – 288.
The Power of Belnap: Sequent Systems for SIXTEEN ₃. [REVIEW]Heinrich Wansing - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):369 - 393.
Metafizyka w logice.Jacek Wojtysiak - 1999 - Filozofia Nauki 1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
56 (#273,290)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jean-Yves Beziau
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references