Brexit behaviourally: lessons learned from the 2016 referendum

Mind and Society 18 (1):13-31 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Nobel Prize winner Richard Thaler was among those who expected Remain to win the EU referendum. Yet on 23 June 2016, a majority in the UK voted to Leave by a margin of 52–48%. A study of over 450 Leave voters, based on the MINDSPACE framework, looks at whether behavioural factors affected the outcome and at what lessons could be learned for any future votes. It finds that voters had low levels of knowledge which may have undermined any ‘status quo bias’; that messengers used by the Remain campaign didn’t work for this audience; that the Remain campaign’s loss-framed figure of £4300 per household per year was judged to be less than the Leave campaign’s figure of £350 m a week ; and that behaviourally-based arguments on immigration might have had an impact. It notes how behavioural science was used successfully to increase turnout. The implication for communicators is that a ‘Test, Learn, Adapt’ strategy could be helpful in future campaigns.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Types of Referendum in Revised Constitution.Ştefan Alexandru Băişanu - 2011 - Annals of Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines 2 (1).
Brexit and the Future UK-EU Trade Relationship. Confronting the Challenges.Federico Ortino - 2017 - Governare la Paura. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2.
What Lessons Can We Learn?W. A. Hart - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (4):663-673.


Added to PP

15 (#693,217)

6 months
1 (#419,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Add more references