Saving the World through Sacrificing Liberties? A Critique of some Normative Arguments in Unfit for the Future

Neuroethics 12 (1):23-34 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The paper critically engages with some of the normative arguments in Julian Savulescu and Ingmar Persson’s book Unfit for the Future. In particular, it scrutinizes the authors’ argument in denial of a moral right to privacy as well as their political proposal to alter humankind’s moral psychology in order to avert climate change, terrorism and to redress global injustice.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Julian Savulescu.
The Normative Root of the Climate Change Problem.Stephen James Purdey - 2012 - Ethics and the Environment 17 (2):75-96.
Cosmopolitan Justice, Rights, and Global Climate Change.Simon Caney - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2).
Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement.S. Cordell - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (255):330-332.
Summary of Unfit for the Future.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):338-339.
Future Global Change and Cognition.Stephan Lewandowsky - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1):7-18.


Added to PP

62 (#265,730)

6 months
5 (#703,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?