Quantum logic, conditional probability, and interference

Philosophy of Science 49 (3):402-421 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Friedman and Putnam have argued (Friedman and Putnam 1978) that the quantum logical interpretation of quantum mechanics gives us an explanation of interference that the Copenhagen interpretation cannot supply without invoking an additional ad hoc principle, the projection postulate. I show that it is possible to define a notion of equivalence of experimental arrangements relative to a pure state φ , or (correspondingly) equivalence of Boolean subalgebras in the partial Boolean algebra of projection operators of a system, which plays a role in the Copenhagen explanation of interference analogous to the role played by the material equivalence, given φ , of certain propositions in the Friedman-Putnam quantum logical analysis. I also show that the quantum logical interpretation and the Copenhagen interpretation are equally capable of avoiding the paradoxical conclusion of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument (Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen 1935). Thus, neither interference phenomena nor the correlations between separated systems provide a test case for distinguishing between the relative acceptability of the Copenhagen interpretation and the quantum logical interpretation as explanations of quantum effects

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Quantum Theory Helps Us Explain.Richard Healey - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1):axt031.
The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics.John G. Cramer - 1986 - Reviews of Modern Physics 58 (3):647-687.
Philosophen in der mikrowelt — ratlos?Manfred Stöckler - 1986 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):68-95.
Quantum logic and the projection postulate.Geoffrey Hellman - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):469-486.
Mandelstam's interpretation of quantum mechanics in comparative perspective.A. A. Pechenkin - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):265 – 284.
A philosopher looks at quantum mechanics (again).Hilary Putnam - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):615-634.
Quantum logic and the luders rule.Allen Stairs - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):422-436.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#264,197)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Bub
University of Maryland, College Park