- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences
Harvard University Press (2010)
Abstract
1. Sexual Brains and Body Politics 2. Hormones and Hardwiring 3. Making Sense of Brain Organization Studies 4. Thirteen Ways of Looking at Brain Organization 5. Working Backward from “Distinct‘ Groups 6. Masculine and Feminine Sexuality 7. Sexual Orienteering 8. Sex-Typed Interests 9. Taking Context Seriously 10. Trading Essence for Potential.
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Book review: Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences. [REVIEW]Tora Holmberg - 2012 - European Journal of Women's Studies 19 (2):267-271.
Rebecca M. Jordan-Young, Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010), xiv + 394 pp., illus., $35.00. [REVIEW]Erika Lorraine Milam - 2011 - Journal of the History of Biology 44 (1):163-165.
Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. By Cordelia fine. New York: W. W. Norton & company, 2010. Brain storm: The flaws in the science of sex differences. By Rebecca M. jordan‐young. Cambridge, mass.: Harvard university press, 2010. [REVIEW]Letitia Meynell - 2013 - Hypatia 28 (3):684-689.
The Diversity of Intrinsic Ethical Flaws in Fiction.Adriana Clavel-vázquez - 2020 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (2):143-156.
Death, Brain Death, and the Limits of Science: Why the Whole-Brain Concept of Death Is a Flawed Public Policy.Mike Nair-Collins - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):667-683.
Response: A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia.David Shaw - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):123-125.
Taming tempests through telegraphy and media appearances: Science communication and the construction of a Swedish storm-warning system before the Great War.Gustav Holmberg - 2007 - Annals of Science 64 (1):77-91.
Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties.Aaron Smuts - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
Brain differences, anthropological stories, and educational implications.Christy Hammer & R. Valentine Dusek - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):257-257.
The English lexicon of interpersonal affect: Love, etc.Christine Storm & Tom Storm - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (3):333-356.
Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey.Jeannette McGlone - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (2):215-227.
Sex differences in descending pain modulatory pathways may clarify sex differences in pain.Wendy F. Sternberg - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (3):466-467.
New physical foundations for cognitive science.Stephen W. Kercel - 2008 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 29 (1-2):159-193.
There are no known differences in brain mechanisms of consciousness between humans and other mammals.Bernard J. Baars - 2001 - Animal Welfare Supplement 10:31- 40.
Between-sex differences are often averaging artifacts.Hoben Thomas - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):265-265.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-25
Downloads
17 (#815,534)
6 months
6 (#417,196)
2020-11-25
Downloads
17 (#815,534)
6 months
6 (#417,196)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Virtue, Social Knowledge, and Implicit Bias.Alex Madva - 2016 - In Michael Brownstein & Jennifer Mather Saul (eds.), Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 191-215.
Out of Bounds? A Critique of the New Policies on Hyperandrogenism in Elite Female Athletes.Katrina Karkazis, Rebecca Jordan-Young, Georgiann Davis & Silvia Camporesi - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):3-16.
Sins of Inquiry: How to Criticize Scientific Pursuits.Marina DiMarco & Kareem Khalifa - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 92 (C):86-96.
The social dimensions of scientific knowledge.Helen Longino - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation.Gina Rippon, Rebecca Jordan-Young, Anelis Kaiser & Cordelia Fine - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-sqt28 uwo