Why We Need to Understand Derivatives in Relation to Money: A Reply to Tony Norfield

Historical Materialism 20 (3):97-109 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The issue of the relation between financial derivatives, money and crisis remains one of on-going debate within Marxism. This paper takes issue with a recent contribution to this debate by Tony Norfield. We contend that the relationship between financial derivatives and the concept of ‘money’ needs to be framed in the context of a changing understanding of liquidity, and that issues of crisis and renewed accumulation are better understood though this path than via debates about speculative versus real investment and productive versus unproductive capital. Indeed these latter taxonomies are being superseded by current developments within finance, and Marxian analysis needs to be attuned to these current developments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-30

Downloads
62 (#193,936)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How is Bitcoin Money?Ole Bjerg - 2016 - Theory, Culture and Society 33 (1):53-72.
Political Economy through the Looking Glass.Beverley Best - 2017 - Historical Materialism 25 (3):76-100.

Add more citations