Keep the chickens cooped: the epistemic inadequacy of free range metaphysics

Synthese 197 (5):1867-1887 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper aims to better motivate the naturalization of metaphysics by identifying and criticizing a class of theories I call ’free range metaphysics’. I argue that free range metaphysics is epistemically inadequate because the constraints on its content—consistency, simplicity, intuitive plausibility, and explanatory power—are insufficiently robust and justificatory. However, since free range metaphysics yields clarity-conducive techniques, incubates science, and produces conceptual and formal tools useful for scientifically engaged philosophy, I do not recommend its discontinuation. I do recommend, however, ending the discipline’s bad faith. That is, I urge that free range metaphysics not be taken to have fully satisfactory epistemic credentials over and above its pragmatic ones.

Similar books and articles

Free will.Kevin Timpe - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Free Will.Joseph Keim Campbell - 2011 - Malden, MA: Polity.
Free Will.Joseph Keim Campbell - 2011 - Malden, MA: Polity.
Libertarian Free Will: Contemporary Debates.David Palmer (ed.) - 2014 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Riddles of Existence: A Guided Tour of Metaphysics: New Edition.Earl Brink Conee & Theodore Sider - 2005 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Edited by Theodore Sider.
Simplicity as a criterion of theory choice in metaphysics.Andrew Brenner - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (11):2687-2707.
Free action and free will.Gary Watson - 1987 - Mind 96 (April):154-72.


Added to PP

1,782 (#4,172)

6 months
152 (#10,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Amanda Bryant
Ryerson University

References found in this work

Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Don Ross, David Spurrett & John G. Collier.
The metaphysics within physics.Tim Maudlin - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 63 references / Add more references