Uterus Transplantation: The Ethics of Using Deceased Versus Living Donors

American Journal of Bioethics 18 (7):6-15 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Research teams have made considerable progress in treating absolute uterine factor infertility through uterus transplantation, though studies have differed on the choice of either deceased or living donors. While researchers continue to analyze the medical feasibility of both approaches, little attention has been paid to the ethics of using deceased versus living donors as well as the protections that must be in place for each. Both types of uterus donation also pose unique regulatory challenges, including how to allocate donated organs; whether the donor / donor's family has any rights to the uterus and resulting child; how to manage contact between the donor / donor's family, recipient, and resulting child; and how to track outcomes moving forward.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical and Legal Aspects of Unrelated Living Donors in Romania.Mihaela Frunza - 2009 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 8 (22):3-23.
Allowing autonomous agents freedom.A. J. Cronin - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):129-132.
Narratives: an essential tool for evaluating living kidney donations.Anne Hambro Alnaes - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):181-194.
Gender imbalance in living organ donation.Nikola Biller-Andorno - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):199-203.
Pediatric kidney transplantation: a review.A. Sharma, R. Ramanathan, M. Posner & R. A. Fisher - 2013 - Transplant Research and Risk Management 2013.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-25

Downloads
36 (#419,193)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?